Knupp v. District Of Columbia,

578 A.2d 702 (D.C.App. 1990)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

A testator gave instructions to his attorney to draft a will with a residual beneficiary. That attorney screwed up and failed to name the residual beneficiary as he was instructed. The two prior wills drafted by the same attorney for the testator named a personal friend Richard Knupp (P) as the residual beneficiary. The attorney submitted an affidavit admitting that he had mistakenly failed to designate the residual beneficiary as he had been instructed. The trial judge found the will was ambiguous on its face and heard extrinsic evidence. However, the judge came to his senses and excluded that evidence. This appeal resulted.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.