Landeros v. Flood

17 Cal.3d 399 (1976)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Gita Landeros (P) took a medical malpractice action against Flood (D) and the hospital he worked for, for the failure to diagnose a medical condition that P suffered from. P was born in 1970, and during her first year of life, P was severely beaten by her mother and her mother's common-law husband. When P was 11 months old she was taken to the San Jose Hospital (D1) and examined by D. At that time, P was suffering from a comminuted spiral fracture of the right tibia and fibula. P's mother had no explanation for the injury nor the bruises over her entire back nor for the superficial abrasions. P also had a nondepressed linear fracture of the skull. P exhibited all the symptoms of a battered child. P alleges that D negligently failed to take X-rays and thus failed to diagnose that P suffered from battered child syndrome. P was returned to the mother and the mother's husband until a year later when P was taken to another hospital, and that hospital made the correct diagnosis. P was placed in protective custody, and the perpetrators were brought to justice. P sued alleging that D and D1 were a proximate cause of P's injuries. Ds demurred and those were granted. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.