This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ps sought recovery of a note due from D in the sum of $2826.29; the recovery of a Ford Econoline van which D was to have contributed to the capital of the corporation; and the value of other property allegedly misappropriated by D. D answered by way of a general denial except as to the note in question, to which he alleged a failure of consideration and, in addition, counterclaimed for double damages for wages oppressively and maliciously withheld from him by the corporation; expenses incurred during employment; failure of the corporation to pay obligations allegedly assumed; the value of certain property of nominal value, the return of which he claims was wrongfully denied; and for slander by Larson. (P). The corporation got the judgment on the note and interest, offset by partial failure of consideration, together with the value of the van which D had sold, title having never been transferred to the corporation, and for D on his counterclaim for wages only without awarding double damages and the sum of $1.00 against Larson (P) because of his slanderous statements. D appealed in part on the inadequate damages for slander.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.