London Leasing Corp. v. Interfina, Inc.

279 N.Y.S.2d 209 (1967)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D made and delivered to P a promissory note for $52,000. It was signed by D1 as president of D, and also personally indorsed by D1. The note was not paid and D, by D1, entered into letter agreements with P extending the time for payment. D1 signed the agreements, but only in his corporate capacity. Eventually, the sum of $19,500 was due. P filed a motion for summary judgment against Ds. Against D there is no question that summary judgment should be granted. D1 contends that the extension agreements discharged him from personal liability on the note because he did not personally consent to the extension. .

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.