Long Island Care At Home, Ltd. v. Coke

551 U.S. 158 (2007)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

A provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act exempts from the statute’s minimum wage and maximum hours rules “any employee employed in domestic service employment to provide companionship services for individuals who (because of age or infirmity) are unable to care for themselves (as such terms are defined and delimited by regulations of the Secretary [of Labor]).” 29 U. S. C. §213(a)(15). A Department of Labor regulation says that this statutory exemption includes those “companionship” workers who “are employed by an employer or agency other than the family or household using their services.” 29 CFR §552.109(a) (2006). P, a domestic worker who provides “companionship services” to elderly and infirm men and women, brought this lawsuit against her former employer, D. P alleged that Ds failed to pay her the minimum wages and overtime wages to which she was entitled under the FLSA and a New York statute, and she sought a judgment for those unpaid wages. The District Court found DOL’s third-party regulation valid and controlling, and it consequently dismissed P’s lawsuit. The Second Circuit found the Department’s third-party regulation “unenforceable” and set aside the District Court’s judgment. D's sought certiorari.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.