This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Batley was the agent and manager of the Earl and in the course of that employment committed a breach of an injunction even though he had been served with the specifics of the injunction that was ordered against the Earl. P filed a motion to commit Batley to prison for his knowing violation of the court order. This first motion failed as a result of a technical objection; that it omitted the words “servants and agents.” P then filed another action against Batley for knowingly assisting in the breach of an injunction.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.