Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P had worked for Coleman (D) for 28 years starting in 1960 as an industrial engineer. In 1985, D became the director of manufacturing for the Mobile Home Division. At that time, P was assured by superiors that the creation of new divisions would not jeopardize the employees of the Mobile Home Division. P was assured that there would always be a position for him at D. In the beginning of the new year in 1988, P was told by his Department Head that he was out the door because of two divisions combining. P filed suit on January 19, 1990, alleging that his termination was a breach of contract and a violation of the federal Age Discrimination and Employment Act. P sought to amend his complaint to add an action for fraud on November 5, 1990, based on the misrepresentations made by his superiors in 1985. D argued that an action for fraud was time-barred by the two-year Kansas statute of limitations. P contends that the fraud claim should relate back under Rule 15(c).

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.