Marx v. Akers

666 N.E.2d 1034 (1996)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P sued IBM under a derivative lawsuit for excessive compensation to executives and directors. P's amended complaint alleged that the board wasted the assets of the corporation. P claimed that during a period of declining profits the director defendants engaged in self-dealing by awarding excessive compensation to 15 of 18 outside directors. D moved to dismiss for the failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as P failed to serve a demand on the board to initiate a lawsuit. The complaint was dismissed because P did not make demand upon the board that it initiate a lawsuit. The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the complaint did not contain any details from which the futility of the demand could be inferred.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.