Matthews v. Campbell Soup Company
380 F. Supp. 1061 (1974)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P seeks to recover for injuries to his teeth and gums which were allegedly suffered while he was eating the contents of a can of D's Oyster Stew Soup. The object that caused the damage has been identified as a small irregularly shaped oyster pearl. P has sued in strict liability in tort and negligence in the manufacture and labeling of this product. D has moved for summary judgment under the foreign natural doctrine. Under that doctrine, D claims that the soup is not defective as D cannot be held liable for injuries from substances natural to the food.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner