Matthews v. Campbell Soup Company
380 F. Supp. 1061 (1974)
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P seeks to recover for injuries to his teeth and gums which were allegedly suffered while he was eating the contents of a can of D's Oyster Stew Soup. The object that caused the damage has been identified as a small irregularly shaped oyster pearl. P has sued in strict liability in tort and negligence in the manufacture and labeling of this product. D has moved for summary judgment under the foreign natural doctrine. Under that doctrine, D claims that the soup is not defective as D cannot be held liable for injuries from substances natural to the food.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner