Milkovich v. Saari

203 N.W.2d 408 (1973)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P and Ds are residents of Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. They left Thunder Bay for Duluth, Minnesota, to shop and attend a play. The car belonged to Erma Saari (D), who drove the first part of the trip. Judith Rudd took over the driving, and about 40 miles south of the U.S. border the car left the road and crashed into rock formations adjacent to the road, causing the injuries to P. P was hospitalized at Duluth for approximately 1 1/2 months and thereafter returned to her home in Thunder Bay. D's car was garaged, registered, and insured in the Province of Ontario, Canada. Ontario has a guest statute wherein P would have to establish gross negligence in order to recover. Minnesota does not have a guest statute. P filed suit against Ds in Ontario but later filed a suit against Ds in Minnesota. Ds moved to dismiss and the court denied the motion. Ds appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.