This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D's 12-year-old son, Jonathan, had cerebral palsy. The boy died in his sleep. D feared charges of neglect because of bedsores on his body. Two of her teenage sons and two of their friends devised a plan to conceal the facts surrounding Jonathan's death by incinerating his body in the course of burning the family's mobile home. They planned to leave Donald Rector, a mentally ill teenager living with the family, to avoid any appearance that Jonathan had been unattended. D's son Darian and a friend set the fire, and Donald died. D was arrested, and police were under orders not to give her a Miranda warning. D confessed. D was then given a Miranda warning, and immediately the interrogation began again with full reference to the previous confession. D confessed again in a matter of minutes. D sought to exclude both statements. The police admitted they made a 'conscious decision' to withhold Miranda warnings: question first, then give the warnings, and then repeat the question 'until I get the answer that she's already provided once.' The court admitted the responses given after the Miranda recitation. D was convicted of second-degree murder. The Court of Appeals affirmed. The State Supreme Court reversed holding that '[i]n the circumstances here, where the interrogation was nearly continuous, ... the second statement, clearly, the product of the invalid first statement should have been suppressed.' The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.