Molasky v. Garfinkle

380 F.Supp. 549 (1974)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Molasky (P) owned stock in Ancorp that was purchased at an average price of $15 per share. On March 15, 1973, trading in Ancorp shares was halted on the New York Stock Exchange, and Ancorp filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. P sued a number of people for fraudulently manipulating the market for Ancorp stock and sued Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. for preparing financial reports that were materially misleading in violation of section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. A third count for a common law claim against Peat Marwick was grounded on diversity and pendent jurisdiction. Peat Marwick moved under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the count regarding the financial reports for a failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. P had not sold its shares, and as such, it did not have a cause of action under section 10(b).

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.