Neita v. City Of Chicago

830 F.3d 494 (7th Cir. 2016)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P owned and operated a dog-grooming business and rescue shelter called A Doggie Business. P brought two dogs to Chicago's Department of Animal Care and Control and interfaced with Travis. One of the dogs, Osa, had become overly aggressive and attacked and killed another dog in P's care. The other dog, Olive Oil, had become ill after whelping a litter of puppies. Travis called the police. Officers Raddatz and Uldrych responded to the call and, after speaking with Travis, arrested P. Officers Raddatz and Uldrych responded to the call and, after speaking with Travis, arrested P. P was charged with two counts of animal cruelty and thirteen counts of violating an animal owner's duties under Illinois law. An Illinois judge found him not guilty on all counts. P filed this action against Travis, Raddatz and Uldrych, and the City of Chicago (Ds). P alleged liability under §1983 for false arrest and illegal searches in violation of the Fourth Amendment and under Illinois law for malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress. P twice amended his complaint, and Ds moved to dismiss each iteration for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). After the first dismissal, P amended the complaint and the judge dismissed with prejudice. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.