This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P entered into agreements to purchase from Clyde Hutcheson three subdivision lots. As required by city ordinance, Hutcheson had posted a performance bond on August 7, 1973, with D as surety, to guarantee construction of off-site improvements on these lots. Following several extensions granted Hutcheson to perform on the bond, P filed a complaint against Hutcheson and the City of Flagstaff seeking damages and a writ of mandamus compelling the City of Flagstaff to complete the off-site improvements as soon as possible. The Superior Court ordered the City to complete the improvements on or before June 15, 1977. The off-site improvements were finally completed in the summer of 1977. On November 29, 1977, Ps amended their complaint to add D as a party. Ps sought damages from D due to Hutcheson's failure to complete the off-site improvements. Ps claimed they were third-party beneficiaries of the performance bond. Ps alleged that D has assumed all obligations and damages owed by Hutcheson to Ps by virtue of a November 4, 1976, assignment agreement. Partial summary judgment was entered in favor of D and Ps appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.