This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

ICON (P) and D manufacture fitness equipment. P owns the ’710 patent, which discloses an elliptical exercise machine that allows for adjustments to fit the individual stride paths of users. P has never commercially sold the machine disclosed in the ’710 patent. P sued D alleging that D's machines infringed several claims of the ’710 patent. The District Court granted D’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that D’s machines did not infringe P’s patent. D moved for attorney’s fees under §285. The Court denied Octane’s motion because D could show neither that P’s claim was objectively baseless nor that P had brought it in subjective bad faith. The Court rejected D’s argument that the judgment of noninfringement “should have been a foregone conclusion to anyone who visually inspected” D’s machines. P appealed the judgment of noninfringement, and D cross-appealed the denial of attorney’s fees. The Federal Circuit affirmed both orders. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.