This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

F and Ziegler (M) were married in August 1989. Their only child, Lauren, was born in January 1990. They divorced in December 1994. Both are attorneys. F agreed to pay for their daughter's daycare and education expenses. Their daughter no longer requires constant daycare, and she now attends public schools. Olmstead estimates that he spends approximately $80 per month on childcare. At the time of the divorce, F earned $53,000, and M earned $16,753 in 1994. M was subsequently hired as an attorney with the firm of Baxter, Bruce & Brand in Juneau, where her annual income increased significantly. In 1998, she earned $53,761. F's law partner was tired of F playing cards on the computer and left the partnership. F's income decreased significantly during this period. In 1996 his income dropped to $10,157. In 1998 he earned $13,075. F decided to become a teacher. F moved the court to modify child support. The trial denied the motion. The trial court found that the parties still possessed equal earning capacities. The trial court also reasoned that F has elected to learn new things for a while, and perhaps take on a new career. He is free to do so, but under our case law M and the child are not expected to finance these choices.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.