Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip

499 U.S. 1 (1991).

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Haslip (P) incurred costs of $4,000 for surgery and made a claim against her medical insurance company, Pacific Mutual Life (D). D's claim was denied for nonpayment of premium. D's agent had been stealing her premiums and that of many of P's co-workers. P could not pay her doctor, and he got a judgment against P for the $4,000. P sued D. P was given a verdict for $200,000 compensatory damages and $840,000 punitive damages. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed. D appealed claiming that the award violated due process.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.