This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P and his wife, Martha departed in the aircraft inspected by D and lost control of the aircraft, and the plane crashed. Approximately four and a half months prior to the flight P took his airplane to D for inspection and service. In servicing the aircraft, D replaced both rear wing attach point brackets on the plane. The administratrix of the estate, filed suit against D alleging that the rear wing attach point brackets sold and installed were defective because they lacked the bolts necessary to secure them to the airplane. P asserted claims for breach of common law warranty, and breach of express and implied warranties under UCC Article 2. D filed a motion to dismiss, contending that the transaction with P had been primarily for the sale of services, rather than of goods and that consequently the transaction was not covered by UCC Article 2. D claims that all parts replaced on the plane were installed pursuant to the requirements of the annual inspection; and that the parts sold had not come from stock maintained by D but instead had been ordered specifically for P's airplane. The trial court denied D's motion to dismiss. D filed a motion for permission to file an interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss, and it was granted.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.