Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.

571 F.Supp.2d 17 (2008)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P filed the instant suit against Ds alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of the standards of professional conduct, unjust enrichment, violation of the Lantham Act, and appropriation of name and likeness. After a motion to dismiss the remaining counts are limited to breach of contract against D and breach of fiduciary duty and violations of the standards of professional conduct with respect to Judicial Watch and Orfanedes (D). It is undisputed that Klayman, present counsel for P, signed an agreement and subsequent modification thereto as 'Chairman and General Counsel' of D.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.