This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Bowley (D) was charged with engaging in oral copulation. D's accomplice was the only witness against him. The accomplice's testimony was the only foundation for the introduction as evidence of a film showing the two of them engaging in oral copulation. This film was the only evidence corroborating the accomplice's testimony. D was convicted. D appealed the admission of this film into evidence.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.