Martin (D) was charged by information with two counts of horse racing bookmaking and two counts of keeping premises for purposes of bookmaking. The trial court granted D's motion to set the information aside based on the determination that the evidence against him was seized in violation of his constitutional rights; an illegal seizure. D disclaimed an interest in the premises searched and the property seized.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.