People v. Mayberry

31 Cal.3d 335, 644 P.2d 810 (1982)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Officers Cooper and Flores and a fully-trained and qualified narcotics dog were checking all luggage from Florida for evidence of narcotics. The dog alerted the officers to Mayberry's (D) suitcase. When D picked up the suitcase, officer Cooper identified himself and informed D of the dog's alert. D consented to a search of his suitcase. Officer Cooper told D that he had never failed to get a search warrant under similar circumstances. D was advised of his Miranda rights, and the suitcase was opened and found to contain marijuana. The trial court denied D's motion to suppress the evidence. D then pleaded guilty to the charge of transporting marijuana. D appealed; the dog's sniffing of his luggage constituted an unreasonable exploratory search.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.