This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Archambault (D) owned a house that was built partially on P's lot. D was innocent of any wrongdoing other than not discovering the problem prior to his acquisition of the title from his predecessor. Both lots were registered. The encroachment was discovered just twenty years after it was made. The trial judge ordered the encroachment removed. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.