This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Plantation (P) developed condominiums. P contracted with Colonial (D) to provide permanent financing for P's condominium sales. D agreed to provide financing over two years in three phases. The first phase was for one year at a fixed rate. The second and third phases were for six-month periods at the same rate, unless market conditions justified a change in the rate. P paid a nonrefundable commitment fee of $60,000 for the first phase and had the option to extend financing for six month periods by paying $30,000 for each extension in phase two and three. When the first phase expired, D raised its interest rate. P objected to the increase in the rates and refused to pay the additional $30,000. P sued for breach of contract and fraud; the increased rates were not justified by market conditions. D claimed that it did not breach the contract because the payment of the $30,000 was a condition precedent to its performance. The trial court found for P on the contract claim and for D on the fraud claim. Both parties appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.