Pommer v. Medtest Corporation

961 F.2d 620 (7th Cir. 1992)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Medtest (D) had a single asset; a self-administered cervicovaginal cytology testing process. Manning devised the process and West, a lawyer, formed Medtest to obtain a patent and undertake development to make the process commercially attractive. Manning held 31% of the stock and West had 26%. In 1982, Manning sold some of his stock to Pommer (P) for $200,000 in total for a 3% share of the company. P eventually sued for fraud in that West had told them there was a patent on the process when they bought their stock and that Abbott Labs was negotiating to purchase the asset for 50-100 million. None of these statements on their absolute face were true. The jury returned a verdict for P of $300,000 and the judge set aside the verdict and entered judgment for Ds; none of the representations made to Ps were materially false. This appeal resulted.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.