Poore v. Fox Hollow Enterprises

1994 WL 150872 (Sup. Ct. De. 1994)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P appealed the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which denied her claim for unemployment compensation. P filed her opening brief and D, filed its answering brief. It was filed by Campbell, the registered agent of D, through Richard P. Eckman, Esquire. P's Counsel contacted Eckman concerning deficiencies in the answering brief. Eckman said that he neither drafted nor filed the answering brief on behalf D. Mr. Eckman also stated neither he nor any member of his firm had entered an appearance in this case. During the oral arguments, Campbell admitted he drafted the answering brief himself. Campbell did not have a license to practice law in Delaware but D was an LLC, and he did not need one to appear on behalf of D. P contends that a Limited Liability Company cannot conduct litigation in Superior Court without representation by Delaware counsel.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.