This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P and D entered into a contract for D to employ P for one year and pay him $17 a week. P was to report at the shop for duty at 6.30 A.M. and remain there on duty until 6 P.M. with an hour for lunch. P was to also work overtime at said shop . . . not more than two hours in one day and not more than two months in the aggregate for the year without pay. D discharged P. P accepted D's repudiation of the contract and sued to recover the reasonable value of his overtime hours. The trial court gave the judgment to P, and D appealed. P contends that the $17 was payment for only the time between 6.30 A.M. and 6 P.M. and not for the extra time. Ds contend that the $17 was a payment for the services of the week whatever they were and that P has been fully paid and so cannot recover.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.