This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Pouncey (P) was injured while putting anti-freeze in his car. The car was manufactured by Ford Motor Co. (D). While P accelerated the engine with the hood open, a blade broke off the radiator fan, cut through the water hose, and struck P in the face. The accident caused permanent facial disfigurement. P had purchased the car approximately six months before from Clement Motor Company. At the time of the accident, the car had been driven approximately 62,000 miles. P sued D for damages for the injury on a products liability theory. The jury gave verdict to P for $15,000. D appealed from the denial of their motion for a directed verdict, and a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative for a new trial. D's main problem with the decision is that the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's verdict.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.