Premier Van Schaack Realty, Inc. v. Sieg

51 P.3d 24 (2002)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D entered into the Agreement with Coldwell Banker. Coldwell Banker subsequently assigned the Agreement to P. The Listing period was 12 months. In March 1997, P's agent introduced D to Michael Davis, Marion Vaughn, and Jane Johnson (DVJ), who offered to purchase the Property for $1.3 million. D made a counter-offer that DVJ accepted. The sale never closed, and D returned DVJ's earnest money. In June 1997, DVJ proposed that they form a limited liability company (LLC) with D. DVJ and Sieg signed an operating agreement (the Operating Agreement), forming the LLC, MJTM in September of 1997. D would convey the Property to MJTM and D would receive a 40% interest in MJTM and a preferential return of 9% on future profits. D had a beginning balance of $670,000 in his initial capital contribution account and that MJTM assumed $580,000 of D's debt. The other members of MJTM agreed not to encumber the Property without D's approval. The Operating Agreement stated that the agreed value of the Property was $1.3 million. Furthermore, the Operating Agreement provided, 'No Member shall be personally liable to any other Member for the return of any part of the Members' Capital Contributions.' On January 21, 1998, D transferred title to the Property to MJTM by warranty deed. In January 1998, MJTM borrowed $1.413 million from Zions Bank secured by a lien on the Property. All of the members of MJTM personally guaranteed the loan. MJTM paid off a $300,000 loan to D secured by the Property. P discovered the arrangement with MJTM and demanded its commission of 7% of $1.3 million. D claimed that his contribution of the Property was an investment and not a sale or exchange. P sued. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled in favor of D, holding that the transaction between D and MJTM was not a sale or exchange pursuant to the Agreement because it lacked consideration. The trial court awarded attorney fees to D. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.