Prentice v. Officemax North America, Inc.

2021 WL:2386123 (2021)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D filed a motion to disqualify counsel for Ps since their counsel hired an attorney, namely, Talib Ellison, Esq., after Ellison left his employment with counsel for D, namely, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, LLC (Ogletree), and since Ellison worked on this very case on behalf of D when he was with Ogletree. Ps claim that Ellison was properly screened, that D will not be prejudiced by counsel's continued representation, and that disqualification of their counsel would cause an undue hardship on them.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.