Prentice v. Officemax North America, Inc.
2021 WL:2386123 (2021)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D filed a motion to disqualify counsel for Ps since their counsel hired an attorney, namely, Talib Ellison, Esq., after Ellison left his employment with counsel for D, namely, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, LLC (Ogletree), and since Ellison worked on this very case on behalf of D when he was with Ogletree. Ps claim that Ellison was properly screened, that D will not be prejudiced by counsel's continued representation, and that disqualification of their counsel would cause an undue hardship on them.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner