Prentice v. Officemax North America, Inc.
2021 WL:2386123 (2021)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D filed a motion to disqualify counsel for Ps since their counsel hired an attorney, namely, Talib Ellison, Esq., after Ellison left his employment with counsel for D, namely, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, LLC (Ogletree), and since Ellison worked on this very case on behalf of D when he was with Ogletree. Ps claim that Ellison was properly screened, that D will not be prejudiced by counsel's continued representation, and that disqualification of their counsel would cause an undue hardship on them.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner