Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
The Frog Jump Gin was a partnership with a spotty financial record of profits and losses in some years. One of the partners, Mrs. Putnam desired to sever her relationship with the other two partners. The partnership was heavily indebted to The Bank of Trenton and Trust Company. John and Marie Shoaf displayed an interest in obtaining Mrs. Putnam's 1/2 interest in the partnership. The books revealed a negative financial position of $90,000. The Shoafs agreed to take over her position if Mrs. Putnam and the Charltons (the other partners) would each pay $21,000 into the partnership accounts. Both parties paid the monies in, and the Shoafs assumed all partnership obligations. A quitclaim deed was executed. When a new bookkeeper was hired, it was learned that the old bookkeeper had engaged in a scheme of systematic embezzlement. Gin sued the bookkeeper and the banks that honored the forged checks. Mrs. Putnam was allowed to intervene claiming an interest in any fund paid by the banks and the judgment was in excess of $68,000. The monies were properly divided, and the estate of Mrs. Putnam and the Shoafs argued about their $34,000 windfall.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner