Quivira Mining Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

765 F.2d 126 (10th Cir. 1986)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Ps are contesting D permits (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permits) to two uranium milling or mining facilities. Ps contend that Arroyo del Puerto and San Mateo Creek are not 'waters of the United States,' and therefore D has no jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act to require permits authorizing discharges into these waters. This appeal is from two written determinations of D to deny review. The Arroyo del Puerto and the San Mateo Creek flow for short distances from the discharge points. Although neither the Arroyo del Puerto nor the San Mateo Creek is navigable. Surface flow occasionally occurs, at times of heavy rainfall, providing a surface connection with navigable waters independent of the underground flow. The waters of the Arroyo del Puerto and the San Mateo Creek soak into the earth's surface, become part of the underground aquifers, and after a lengthy period, perhaps centuries, the underground water moves toward eventual discharge at Horace Springs or the Rio San Jose.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.