Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC

395 U.S. 367 (1969)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

In a Red Lion Broadcasting Company (P) radio program, Reverend Billy James Hargis made comments about Fred. J. Cook, an author who had written a book about Senator Barry Goldwater. Hargis alleged that Cook had once been fired by a newspaper for making up charges against city officials, and had later worked for a publication with Communist affiliations. Cook asked P for free airtime to reply to these allegations, but P denied him. However, the Federal Communications Commission (D) found that the Hargis broadcast was a personal attack on Cook, and forced P to give Cook free air time. The lower federal courts upheld D's decision, and P appealed to the Supreme Court. While this litigation was going on, D adopted regulations requiring broadcasters to make free airtime available following personal attacks, political endorsements, editorials, etc. RTNDA (P) complained, and a court of appeals declared these regulations unconstitutional. D appealed to the Supreme Court, which joined the two Ps to consider whether or not the regulations and actions of D violated the 1st amendment.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.