Regina v. Morgan House Of Lords A.C.

182 (1976)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Morgan (D) and three others were members of the RAF and spent the evening together. By the time the party arrived at D's house, Mrs. Morgan was asleep in bed. Mrs. Morgan was aroused from her sleep held by her limbs, and the three companions of D had intercourse with her. They testified that D suggested that they have the sex with his wife. D told his compatriots that they should not be surprised if his wife struggled a bit as she was 'kinky.' A struggle occurred initially, but the men all claimed that Mrs. Morgan actively cooperated with and enjoyed what was being done to her. The jury had to choose between these conflicting statements. The judge instructed the jury that if the men had an honest and reasonable belief in her consent that they would not be guilty. D claims that the consent must only be honest and need not be reasonable. D was convicted and appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.