This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P and D entered into a contractual arrangement for D to purchase a robotic laser cutting machine. P was in the process of manufacturing the Laser D informed P that some of the associated fixtures were no longer needed. The purchase price was amended. Other changes were made, and eventually, the parties got into a price dispute. At that point, D had paid $588,600. P sued D claiming that D owed a remaining balance of $264,300 plus interest. Concept answered with affirmative defenses. D also responded with counterclaims for (1) fraudulent inducement; (2) misrepresentation; (3) unjust enrichment; (4) promissory estoppel; (5) breach of contract; (6) breach of express warranty; and (7) overpayment. In the affirmative defenses, D claimed the contract was void for fraud and failure of consideration. D also claimed laches, waiver, estoppel, and unclean hands. D listed factual allegations in its counterclaim but failed to make or incorporate those allegations into the affirmative defenses. In many of the denials, D claimed that the contract was procured by fraud.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.