Ridder v. City Of Springfield,
109 F.3d 288 (6th Cir. 1997)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
The City of Springfield (D) got a summary judgment following a protracted civil rights litigation. That litigation stemmed from P being involved in an industrial accident and being taken to the hospital emergency room wherein P was identified by a hospital employee as her rapist. P was investigated and could be placed in the general location of several rapes that had occurred, and five of eight victims identified P. P was arrested on a fourteen-count indictment and detained in jail from September 8, 1988, until January 4, 1989, when DNA tests exonerated him. P then filed suit under 42 U.S.C. ¤1983,1985 and state law. A complaint and three amended complaints were filed over the next four years, and discovery was done throughout 1994. D moved for a summary judgment as P admitted in his interrogatories that there was no evidence that Ds acted pursuant to any policy, custom, or usage of D as required by case law. D immediately moved for sanctions against Ridder's (P) counsel, Dwight D. Brannon, pursuant to Rule 11. However, D did not first serve the motion on P's counsel for a safe harbor period as instructed under Rule 11. The magistrate judge imposed sanctions of $32,546.06. P appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner