This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P sought to recover treble damages for rent paid to D which exceeded the maximum rent prescribed under the Housing and Rental Act of 1947. P also sued D for the failure to provide essential services. D counterclaimed that the essential services were to be furnished by P and as a result of P's failure to provide them D was damaged. D also counterclaimed that P induced a real estate appraiser to alter an appraisal of the property that reduced the fair rental value from $450 to $375 per month. P filed a 12(b) motion to dismiss the counterclaims on grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.