This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Rush (P) was injured in a fall from a motorcycle because of a negligently maintained street in the City of Maple Heights (D). P sued D in municipal court claiming that D was negligent in maintaining the street and this negligence was the proximate cause of her injuries. The municipal court awarded P $100 in personal property damages. D appealed, and the judgment was affirmed. P then sued D in another court for personal injuries she suffered in the same accident. P claimed that the issue of negligence was res judicata from the judgment in the first action. P moved to set the trial for damages alone. This motion was granted. P was awarded $12,000. D appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.