Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
In the summer of 1988, Schallock (P) worked for the Arizona Prosecuting Attorneys Advisory Council (APAAL) (D) as a law clerk. Heinze (D) was her boss. P felt that Heinze sexually harassed her while she worked there. In 1990, P sued D (Heinze) and D (APAAL) for this sexual harassment. D claimed that P had no problem with his actions and that they were not unwelcome.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner