Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Tully Const. Co. Inc.

139 A.D.3d 930 (2016)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

In 2000, D entered into a contract with the City of New York to construct a garage. In August 2003, D entered into a subcontract with P, pursuant to furnish and install five elevators for the project. P commenced this action against D to recover damages incurred as a result of delays in the performance of the work. The court found that P was entitled to delay damages in the principal sum of $209,235.36. The court rejected D's contention that P waived its claim for delay damages by failing to comply with a contractual notice requirement. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.