Scott v. Harris

550 U.S. 372 (2007)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Police clocked P’s vehicle traveling at 73 miles per hour on a road with a 55-mile-per-hour speed limit. The deputy activated his blue flashing lights and D ignored them and sped away, initiating a chase down what is in most portions a two-lane road, at speeds exceeding 85 miles per hour. D heard the radio communication and joined the pursuit along with other officers. P pulled into the parking lot of a shopping center and evaded a trap by making a sharp turn, colliding with D’s police car, exiting the parking lot, and speeding off once again down a two-lane highway. D decided to attempt to terminate the episode by employing a PIT maneuver. D got permission but applied his push bumper to the rear of D’s vehicle. D lost control, left the roadway, ran down an embankment, overturned, and crashed. D was rendered a quadriplegic. D sued under 42 U. S. C. §1983, alleging, inter alia, a violation of his federal constitutional rights, viz. use of excessive force resulting in an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. D filed a motion for summary judgment based on an assertion of qualified immunity. The District Court denied the motion. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.