SEC v. Ishopnomarkup.Com, Inc.

2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70684 (E.D.N.Y. 2007)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Knight developed the concept of D -- an internet shopping mall offering products directly from manufacturers to consumers at no markup -- and helped form it in or about August 1999. D conducted three private placement offerings of stock. D distributed confidential offering memoranda (COM) to its investors. The COMs contained detailed information about each D stock offering. Each of the three tranches of stock stated in the COM that 'th]e offering is to be made exclusively to accredited investors, pursuant to the federal registration exemption contained in Regulation D, Rule 504 adopted under the Securities Act.' In total, D sold approximately 6,748,617 shares of stock to at least 355 investors residing in 21 different states. D obtained proceeds of more than $2.3 million. D did not file a registration statement with P with respect to any of the three sales of stock, and there was no registration statement otherwise in effect. In September 2000, D prepared and filed with P a proposed Registration Statement to bring D public. Over a period of several months, P and D traded comments and information. P then refused to approve the Registration Statement, effectively driving D out of business. P commenced this securities law enforcement action on September 20, 2004, alleging violations of the registration and anti-fraud provisions of federal securities law. P moved for partial summary judgment on its Section 5 claims.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.