Seegers v. Sprague

236 N.W.2d 227 (1975)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P sued D based on the fact that P agreed to furnish certain materials and labor to build a septic system on D’s land. The trial court adopted the allegations of the complaint as its findings. D contends that P was always a subcontractor of another by the name of Keller. P claims that it was in privity to D, contrary to the conclusion accepted by the court. D claims to have paid Keller for the septic system. The trial court ordered P to pay D based on knowledge and receipt of the goods but found that P was, in fact, a subcontractor and not in privity with D.