Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.

498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Shroyer (P) filed a class action lawsuit against New Cingular (D). P’s complaint alleges that when AT&T and Cingular merged the cellular phone services received by AT&T’s customers deteriorated significantly. Simultaneously, Cingular sought to induce the customers of AT&T to transfer their service plans and equipment from AT&T to Cingular in order to increase the company’s profits. When P complained about his service, Cingular told him that it would be improved if he signed a new contract with Cingular. P executed an electronic signature over the telephone to assent to the terms of the Agreements. The form contract stated that P agreed to waive any class actions. D filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay further proceedings in the litigation pursuant to § 32 and §43 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 3-4. After hearing oral argument, the judge granted D’s motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the action without prejudice. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.