This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

W acquired against H a judgment for $3024.60 representing child support arrearages. W obtained the issuance of a writ of execution which directed the sheriff to seize certain items of H's personal property. Property was seized and sold. The proceeds did not satisfy the judgment. After the sheriff's sale, a camper and Bronco II were taken by a credit company in payment of the balance of the purchase money loans made to H. Due to the sheriff's sale of the camper and Bronco II, H requested that W have the judgment against him marked satisfied. W refused to do so. The Court decided that since W did not realize any gain from her purchase of the camper and Bronco II, H was not entitled to have the judgment against him marked satisfied. H appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.