This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Sinyard (D) was a manager for IDS. At the age of 49, he was forced to resign. D joined two class actions against IDS alleging age discrimination. As part of his agreement with counsel, they were to be paid 1/3rd of the amount he would obtain by either settlement or jury award. In 1990, the EEOC intervened, and the suits were settled. IDS agreed to pay $5 million. After costs of $1.7 million were deducted the remaining amounts were allocated 1/3rd to tort claims, 1/3rd to lost wages and 1/3rd to attorney’s fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 626(b) and 216(b). IDS agreed to pay the attorney’s fees plus the amounts allocated to legal costs and disbursements directly to the attorneys. The settlement was approved in 1992. The IRS assessed a deficiency in D’s 1992 tax return. The IRS contended that the payment of the attorney’s fees had satisfied an obligation of D and thus it was income. D’s share of the settlement was $547,146. In addition, legal fees and costs of $63,152 were allocated to the nontaxed personal injury damages and excluded from income. The IRS contends that $252,608 in attorney’s fees should be treated as income. The Commissioner held this amount allowable as a miscellaneous itemized deduction that was reduced by 2% of Adjusted Gross Income. This left a deduction of $240,984. The full amount of this deduction could not be taken because D’s income was subject to AMT. The Tax Court upheld the deficiency under 56(b)(1)(A)(i) and Chapter 27C. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.