Smith v. Hobart Mrg. Co.

185 F.Supp. 751 (E.D. Pa. 1960)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Smith (P) was injured by a meat grinding machine that took off his arm. P claimed the machine was designed defectively and introduced expert testimony from a Davidlee Von Ludwig. D objected to this testimony. It was admitted, and P won a verdict for $60,000. D requested a judgment n.o.v. and was denied. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.