This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Two days before the shooting, D purchased a firearm. On September 28, D was told that he was being processed out of the service on a Chapter 13 discharge as an undesirable. D had previously been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic but his officers were unaware of the problems. He was hospitalized twice each for approximately two weeks. D then entered the supply pulled a gun and told a platoon sergeant that he needed a car. Wells persuaded D to follow him into the bin room where one of the two sergeants present turned over to D the keys to his truck. D got the keys to a truck and headed toward downtown Anchorage. Gunfire was exchanged at the Fort Richardson gate. A police chase ensued, and D accelerated to a high rate of speed and was pursued by several marked and unmarked police vehicles. D then pulled over to the side of the road and went running through a wooded area. D fired twice at an officer and hit him in the chest and shoulder. The officer hit D once. D was found lying on the ground, bleeding from the leg. D admits shooting Jordan. D claimed insanity. All the experts agreed that D suffered from chronic schizophrenia. There was disagreement as to whether D's actions fell within the legal definition of insanity. All agreed that D had substantial capacity to tell right from wrong. Two thought that Smith lacked capacity to conform his actions to society's norms, and one did not. D was convicted of shooting with the intent to kill or cause great bodily harm. D appealed, claiming that the court erred by ignoring his experts who said that he suffered from schizophrenia and was not legally sane. Another expert had testified that D was sane despite suffering from the condition.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.